Bitzer 4EES-6Y vs Hanbell RC2-620A
Side-by-side comparison of Bitzer 4EES-6Y and Hanbell RC2-620A compressors. 4 shared refrigerants. Capacity at ULT/LT/MT/HT, qualified refrigerants, F-Gas retrofit paths.
Capacity comparison (kW)
| Refrigerant | Bitzer 4EES-6Y MT | Hanbell RC2-620A MT | Bitzer 4EES-6Y LT | Hanbell RC2-620A LT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1234yf | 6.81 | 196.35 | — | — |
| R134a | 6.78 | 205.13 | — | — |
| R450A | 5.89 | 183.83 | — | — |
| R513A | 7.17 | 187.52 | — | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, Bitzer 4EES-6Y or Hanbell RC2-620A?
At MT conditions (-10 / 45 °C) on the first shared refrigerant, Hanbell RC2-620A is 2783% larger at MT. The full per-refrigerant breakdown is in the comparison table.
What refrigerants do both compressors support?
Both Bitzer 4EES-6Y and Hanbell RC2-620A are qualified for R1234yf, R134a, R450A, R513A. These are the refrigerants where a direct capacity comparison is meaningful.
Can I retrofit one to match the other on a lower-GWP refrigerant?
Yes — open the F-Gas Retrofit tool with either model pre-selected to see drop-in alternatives ranked by capacity match, COP, GWP, and PFAS impact. The retrofit path is the same regardless of whether you're starting from the Bitzer or Hanbell side.
Bitzer 4EES-6Y details · Hanbell RC2-620A details · Open in Benchmark