Hanbell RC2-620A vs BOCK HGX34e/315-4
Side-by-side comparison of Hanbell RC2-620A and BOCK HGX34e/315-4 compressors. 3 shared refrigerants. Capacity at ULT/LT/MT/HT, qualified refrigerants, F-Gas retrofit paths.
Capacity comparison (kW)
| Refrigerant | Hanbell RC2-620A MT | BOCK HGX34e/315-4 MT | Hanbell RC2-620A LT | BOCK HGX34e/315-4 LT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R134a | 0.21 | 0.01 | — | — |
| R450A | 0.18 | 0.01 | — | — |
| R513A | 0.19 | 0.01 | — | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, Hanbell RC2-620A or BOCK HGX34e/315-4?
At standard MT conditions (-10/45 °C) on the first shared refrigerant, Hanbell RC2-620A is 95% larger at MT. The full per-refrigerant breakdown is in the comparison table.
What refrigerants do both compressors support?
Both Hanbell RC2-620A and BOCK HGX34e/315-4 are qualified for R134a, R450A, R513A. These are the refrigerants where a direct capacity comparison is meaningful.
Can I retrofit one to match the other on a lower-GWP refrigerant?
Yes — open the F-Gas Retrofit tool with either model pre-selected to see drop-in alternatives ranked by capacity match, COP, GWP, and PFAS impact. The retrofit path is the same regardless of whether you're starting from the Hanbell or BOCK side.
Hanbell RC2-620A details · BOCK HGX34e/315-4 details · Open in Benchmark